Why Most Inside Sales Reps Fail
- and What to Do About It
If you're in charge of hiring, training and developing inside sales reps, then what you're about to read may shock you a little bit, but it will also resonate with you and explain why many of the reps you hire ultimately fail.In their book, "How to Hire and Develop Your Next Top Performer" by Herb Greenberg, Harold Weinstein and Patrick Sweeney, they compared results from hundreds of thousands of assessments that were conducted over several decades with actual sales performance measurements and concluded:
- 55 percent of the people earning their living in sales should be doing something else, and
- Another 20 to 25 percent (of salespeople) have what it takes to sell, but they should be selling something else.
So, how do you begin to look for and eventually identify the other 45 percent of people who are actually cut out for the career of sales?
Here are 3 important guidelines to follow:- Slow hiring, fast firing. If I were to ask you what activity college football coaches spend up to 70% of their time, what would you say? Watching game film? Coaching their players? Preparing game plans? The answer is none of those. College coaches spend up to 70% of their time recruiting talent to play on their team. Does that surprise you? If you hire sales reps like most companies do, then it probably did.Most companies hire sales reps the wrong way. They hire reps quickly, and they hold on to underperforming reps far too long. The first guideline you want to follow is to do just the opposite. The best thing you can do is always be recruiting and have a constant flow of talent to evaluate and hire. Your goal should be to hire slowly - after a structured and careful evaluation process - and then to be ready to let reps go who have not shown the improvement or performance that you've identified in advance is necessary (you'll refer back to your DSP to arrive at this). The key here is that if you have a steady flow of talent and candidates to choose from, then you'll be much less likely to make quick and ill advised hiring decisions.
- Be more willing to consider and to hire candidates who either don't have your particular sales experience, or don't have any sales experience at all. If we go back to the results earlier in this article - that 55 percent of people in sales should be doing something else, and another 20 to 25 percent should be selling something else - then it means that the common practice of hiring experienced sales candidates will produce an unsatisfactory result as much as 80 percent of the time!A much more effective way of hiring successful sales reps is to start with raw and motivated candidates and then train them properly right from the beginning. Teaching new candidates the right skills and techniques is a lot easier than first getting an experienced sales rep to unlearn all their bad habits first. Of course, you must have a solid sales training program that teaches effective sales skills and the best practices of your particular sale (these best practices will also come after you've defined your sales process - DSP). You can still interview and even hire experience sales reps, but just bare this in mind: The biggest predictor of future success in sales is what the rep has done in the past. What a rep is used to producing and earning defines their comfort zone and in fact defines every aspect of their financial life. If you want to know what an experienced sales rep might produce at your company, then just find out how much they earned at their previous company. Divide this number by their commission, and you'll have a very accurate idea of what you can expect they'll produce. Then ask yourself if that's enough. If it isn't, then take a chance on someone new to the profession of sales and instill in them a new comfort zone based on success at your company.
- Regardless of whether you hire an experienced sales rep or someone new to the profession, what you absolutely must do is make sure your managers are measuring the right indicators of sales success and progress. You would be surprised by how many companies measure and rely on metrics that don't drive sales. I'm talking about things like number of calls, time on the phone, etc. Now don't get me wrong - these are important metrics and they definitely play a role in the success or failure of your inside sales team. But they don't drive sales. Let me explain the difference.While it's obviously important that your reps are making the most amount of calls and contacts with decision makers as possible, this alone will not drive sales. You see, if your reps are not qualifying prospects properly, or if they are not handling objections or brush offs well enough to win sales, then if they simply make more calls, this won't result in a lot more sales. In fact, it will just waste more of their time, more of your resources and result in more frustration in your sales department. The only thing that drives more sales is effective conversations that move the sale forward with qualified prospects. Each contact with a qualified prospect must have benchmarks that are achieved and agreements must be made at every point of the sales cycle for that prospect to ultimately result in a sale. Coaching and measuring the successful navigation of these benchmarks is what drives sales. This is the crucial difference begin measuring quantity (make more calls) versus qualify (measuring what happens during those calls).
Share this article:
